*bakes new cookies for yuriko and the other GMs*

I'm one of the GMs, I can change the rules. And I just got permission from another one of the GMs to do so. So unless Hayley strongly objects...Conia wrote:I'll do the GM work that the current GMs aren't doing:
Da Rules wrote: - Being in the BO isn't a crime. For the third time, you can't arrest Conia for being Gin. Stop trying.
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
But Hayls usually blames Conia slandering himself sooo, I don't see any objections there!PhoenixTears wrote:I'm one of the GMs, I can change the rules. And I just got permission from another one of the GMs to do so. So unless Hayley strongly objects...Conia wrote:I'll do the GM work that the current GMs aren't doing:
Da Rules wrote: - Being in the BO isn't a crime. For the third time, you can't arrest Conia for being Gin. Stop trying.
Conia wrote: Why am I thinking a ferret is an experiment from PT to mix the charm of dogs with the evilness of cats? :V
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
The Doctor wrote:There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
The Doctor wrote:Remember: Hate is always foolish, and love is always wise.
So winning condition doesn't include killing the lovers for town/BO?Win Conditions
- Black Organisation wins if the BO outnumbers the Town, there are no cops remaining, and there is no forseeable way for the town to regain control of a day vote.
- Town wins when all the BO members are killed/lynched/arrested.
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
Theoretically yes, it would complicate things. However, assuming that we get 20+ players, we would be balancing the game based only on the town/BO (so if we have 20 players, we would remove two, and then balance is if we had 18, and then add the lovers back in as remaining roles). For that reason, in the phase where either Town or BO is about to win (assuming that the lovers' votes don't change the results THAT PHASE, or APTX someone from the winning side THAT PHASE in a way that would affect the ending, or arrest someone, if one or both lovers is a cop), they would win, lovers would lose. The lovers' existence/roles would not affect the ending, assuming that, in a non-lovers game, one of the two main sides would win.Kleene Onigiri wrote: So winning condition doesn't include killing the lovers for town/BO?
Since the lovers can add to the votes and also can APTX people, they can decide the outcome at the end a lot? Wouldn't it complicate things at the end when town or BO is about to win?
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence
pofa wrote: I have never done a single thing wrong in mafia, never one lie or act of violence