^^^^Aokochan wrote: I'm sorry for you, cinnamoroll... I wish you good luck for this new year 2013!

^^^^Aokochan wrote: I'm sorry for you, cinnamoroll... I wish you good luck for this new year 2013!
I had something similar happen to me yesterday. I was ringing up the woman's order and scanned a box of Mucinex and got the prompt to scan her ID. The woman flipped out and wanted to know why she would have to even give me her ID for medicine. I told her it was because of the decongestant in the medicine and even the woman behind her in line told her that. Hell, the woman behind her even went so far as to name the specific kind of decongestant and how it was used to make Meth. I finally got her to hand her ID so I can scan it and finished ringing up her first order. I started on her second order and rang up a package of party favor which included some party poppers and some Christmas crackers. (Not the kind you eat but the kind of party favor that you pull open.) The damn woman flips out again and refused to let me scan her ID. She wound up not buying the damn things after throwing a tantrum about how ridiculous it was that she had to be carded for party favors that contain black powder. Lady, I'm acting in accordance with the law and I can't make you an exception. Then, again, I wouldn't even if I could.mangaluva wrote: Well, I started my working day well. I was in the whisky shop, which means IDing some customers. Not all of them, we're allowed to skip ID if the customer looks safely over 25 (legal age is 18, but we're to ID if they look under 25 to be on the safe side), but sometimes we do have to refuse service to customers who don't have ID.
My first transaction was a Spanish couple with silver streaks in their hair, so I skipped IDing. The next was a group of Japanese girls that I ID'd and refused service to because three of them had no ID. They utterly exploded at me, yelling at me for IDing them when I hadn't ID'd the couple ahead of them and accused me of withholding service for being a "racist gaijin".
No, stroppy customer-chan, I ID'd your group because:
1) all of you are shorter than me and look about half my weight,
2) all of you were bedecked in the vastest array of sickening kawaii that I have ever seen
3) when you were talking amongst yourselves, you were using childish speech patterns-- I'm not fluent in Japanese, but I am aware that appending "~ne?" to the end of every single bloody one of your sentences is not what grownups do.
That is why I ID'd you, and that is why I withheld service when some of you had no ID. There's no use in screaming and shouting and eventually throwing a souvenir guide at my head.
Japan is horrible at enforcing their minimum drinking age, so there's likely the "I don't get ID'ed at home!" mentality, too.mangaluva wrote: Well, I started my working day well. I was in the whisky shop, which means IDing some customers. Not all of them, we're allowed to skip ID if the customer looks safely over 25 (legal age is 18, but we're to ID if they look under 25 to be on the safe side), but sometimes we do have to refuse service to customers who don't have ID.
My first transaction was a Spanish couple with silver streaks in their hair, so I skipped IDing. The next was a group of Japanese girls that I ID'd and refused service to because three of them had no ID. They utterly exploded at me, yelling at me for IDing them when I hadn't ID'd the couple ahead of them and accused me of withholding service for being a "racist gaijin".
No, stroppy customer-chan, I ID'd your group because:
1) all of you are shorter than me and look about half my weight,
2) all of you were bedecked in the vastest array of sickening kawaii that I have ever seen
3) when you were talking amongst yourselves, you were using childish speech patterns-- I'm not fluent in Japanese, but I am aware that appending "~ne?" to the end of every single bloody one of your sentences is not what grownups do.
That is why I ID'd you, and that is why I withheld service when some of you had no ID. There's no use in screaming and shouting and eventually throwing a souvenir guide at my head.
Well, 2) and 3) aren't all that valid, considering Japanese culture. Japanese women might actually well do that (due to the whole kawaii idealism). #1 is still valid, though.mangaluva wrote: Well, I started my working day well. I was in the whisky shop, which means IDing some customers. Not all of them, we're allowed to skip ID if the customer looks safely over 25 (legal age is 18, but we're to ID if they look under 25 to be on the safe side), but sometimes we do have to refuse service to customers who don't have ID.
My first transaction was a Spanish couple with silver streaks in their hair, so I skipped IDing. The next was a group of Japanese girls that I ID'd and refused service to because three of them had no ID. They utterly exploded at me, yelling at me for IDing them when I hadn't ID'd the couple ahead of them and accused me of withholding service for being a "racist gaijin".
No, stroppy customer-chan, I ID'd your group because:
1) all of you are shorter than me and look about half my weight,
2) all of you were bedecked in the vastest array of sickening kawaii that I have ever seen
3) when you were talking amongst yourselves, you were using childish speech patterns-- I'm not fluent in Japanese, but I am aware that appending "~ne?" to the end of every single bloody one of your sentences is not what grownups do.
That is why I ID'd you, and that is why I withheld service when some of you had no ID. There's no use in screaming and shouting and eventually throwing a souvenir guide at my head.
I would still think that the kawaii thing is more common with younger people.Callid wrote:Well, 2) and 3) aren't all that valid, considering Japanese culture. Japanese women might actually well do that (due to the whole kawaii idealism). #1 is still valid, though.mangaluva wrote: Well, I started my working day well. I was in the whisky shop, which means IDing some customers. Not all of them, we're allowed to skip ID if the customer looks safely over 25 (legal age is 18, but we're to ID if they look under 25 to be on the safe side), but sometimes we do have to refuse service to customers who don't have ID.
My first transaction was a Spanish couple with silver streaks in their hair, so I skipped IDing. The next was a group of Japanese girls that I ID'd and refused service to because three of them had no ID. They utterly exploded at me, yelling at me for IDing them when I hadn't ID'd the couple ahead of them and accused me of withholding service for being a "racist gaijin".
No, stroppy customer-chan, I ID'd your group because:
1) all of you are shorter than me and look about half my weight,
2) all of you were bedecked in the vastest array of sickening kawaii that I have ever seen
3) when you were talking amongst yourselves, you were using childish speech patterns-- I'm not fluent in Japanese, but I am aware that appending "~ne?" to the end of every single bloody one of your sentences is not what grownups do.
That is why I ID'd you, and that is why I withheld service when some of you had no ID. There's no use in screaming and shouting and eventually throwing a souvenir guide at my head.
That's quite a strange law o.Omangaluva wrote:I know some people feel like it's not fair that you can't buy alcohol if your friends don't have ID, but it's the law.
The law is against buying alcohol for a minor. No, there's nothing to stop people leaving minors outside of the shop, but you'd be amazed at how many people don't, or split up from their friends immediately before coming to the till and expecting us to be too dumb to notice that they're out with people with no ID. Parents with children don't count, but it is illegal to sell ID to someone who is with friends or siblings with no ID, in case they're buying the alcohol for their friends. If they're caught handing over alcohol to a minor outside of the shop, they'll be arrested. It's the same for cigarettes.Callid wrote:That's quite a strange law o.Omangaluva wrote:I know some people feel like it's not fair that you can't buy alcohol if your friends don't have ID, but it's the law.
What stops people from just leaving the minors outside the shop when they buy alcohol?
Only thing more ridiculous would be like forbidding legal guardians from allowing their children to have a sip of wine before they're 21 XD
Still sounds a bit strange to me. Even if one would forget it at the first shop, they can just go to another one and leave them outside then. Or, if the shop is large enough, leave, re-enter the shop and go to a different cashier (leaving the minors outside again) :xmangaluva wrote:The law is against buying alcohol for a minor. No, there's nothing to stop people leaving minors outside of the shop, but you'd be amazed at how many people don't, or split up from their friends immediately before coming to the till and expecting us to be too dumb to notice that they're out with people with no ID. Parents with children don't count, but it is illegal to sell ID to someone who is with friends or siblings with no ID, in case they're buying the alcohol for their friends. If they're caught handing over alcohol to a minor outside of the shop, they'll be arrested. It's the same for cigarettes.Callid wrote:That's quite a strange law o.Omangaluva wrote:I know some people feel like it's not fair that you can't buy alcohol if your friends don't have ID, but it's the law.
What stops people from just leaving the minors outside the shop when they buy alcohol?
Only thing more ridiculous would be like forbidding legal guardians from allowing their children to have a sip of wine before they're 21 XD
That's the same over here, and both practical and (IMO) sufficient.Also, it's not illegal for parents to allow their children to drink in their homes. It is considered up to a parent's discretion whether or not their children are allowed to drink. However, if you allow your children to get drunk in public, that's a different story. If you let your 14-year-old get smashed and then stagger to Tesco's and a police officer spots him, you will be arrested for parental negligence. Fair enough.
No, they're still valid. She isn't refusing service because of them, she's asking for ID because of them. She could ask for ID from every damn customer, but there are some signs that it isn't needed. It isn't a matter of "What will make them card you", but "What will make it so they don't card you".Callid wrote: Well, 2) and 3) aren't all that valid, considering Japanese culture. Japanese women might actually well do that (due to the whole kawaii idealism). #1 is still valid, though.
It's a perfectly logical law. Do you know how many people have older friends they get to buy beer for them? It's not uncommon at all.Callid wrote: That's quite a strange law o.O
A brain, which many don't have. You can't get in trouble for something outside of your control, such as who someone may have waiting for them outside. But if they're standing there, they're obviously together.Callid wrote: What stops people from just leaving the minors outside the shop when they buy alcohol?
Yeah, because a legal guardian allowing a sip is the same as a friend or random stranger buy you booze so you can get wasted out of your mind. No difference at all.Callid wrote: Only thing more ridiculous would be like forbidding legal guardians from allowing their children to have a sip of wine before they're 21 XD
She was listing them as indicators that they were minors, which they weren't. It's a bit like counting facial hair as an indicator for being over 21.GinRei wrote:No, they're still valid. She isn't refusing service because of them, she's asking for ID because of them. She could ask for ID from every damn customer, but there are some signs that it isn't needed. It isn't a matter of "What will make them card you", but "What will make it so they don't card you".Callid wrote: Well, 2) and 3) aren't all that valid, considering Japanese culture. Japanese women might actually well do that (due to the whole kawaii idealism). #1 is still valid, though.
Yes, but there's nothing you can do about it. This law is a bit like making a law that says that speed limits only apply once a policeman has reminded you that you were speeding, and only until he's out of sight. Yes, that means the law is easy to enforce, but the law is weird anyway - the purpose of outlawing speeding is to prevent accidents that occur due to it, not to temporarily stop those speeders that are stupid enough to do it in front of a police car.It's a perfectly logical law. Do you know how many people have older friends they get to buy beer for them? It's not uncommon at all.Callid wrote: That's quite a strange law o.O
Still doesn't mean they'll share the alcohol with them.A brain, which many don't have. You can't get in trouble for something outside of your control, such as who someone may have waiting for them outside. But if they're standing there, they're obviously together.Callid wrote: What stops people from just leaving the minors outside the shop when they buy alcohol?
That's why I said more ridiculous. Also, the random stranger is a weird thing anyway; the stranger should be responsible enough not to buy some kid alcohol.Yeah, because a legal guardian allowing a sip is the same as a friend or random stranger buy you booze so you can get wasted out of your mind. No difference at all.Callid wrote: Only thing more ridiculous would be like forbidding legal guardians from allowing their children to have a sip of wine before they're 21 XD
Don't get nit-picky. The rules are that they check everyone unless they have a reason not to. The rules are not to only card those you believe to be underage.Callid wrote: She was listing them as indicators that they were minors, which they weren't. It's a bit like counting facial hair as an indicator for being over 21.
See, you're getting it wrong. You aren't doing it in front of the enforcers who can nail you on it. You're doing it at the suppliers. A store cannot arrest you or give you a ticket for breaking this law. They can, however, limit their liability.Yes, but there's nothing you can do about it. This law is a bit like making a law that says that speed limits only apply once a policeman has reminded you that you were speeding, and only until he's out of sight. Yes, that means the law is easy to enforce, but the law is weird anyway - the purpose of outlawing speeding is to prevent accidents that occur due to it, not to temporarily stop those speeders that are stupid enough to do it in front of a police car.
Again, limiting the store's liability. There's a chance they will, and they don't want to be held responsible. Don't like it? Bring a freaking ID to prove your age. I don't know why anyone wouldn't have one anyway, especially a foreign traveler who would need a passport.Still doesn't mean they'll share the alcohol with them.
ROFL. Wow, you're naive beyond belief. I don't think any more needs to be said on this matter.That's why I said more ridiculous. Also, the random stranger is a weird thing anyway; the stranger should be responsible enough not to buy some kid alcohol.