"Focus" by the media, not investigations. Police and law enforcement in general wouldn't have any less information. If they do, it'd they get their info from the media, which is beyond stupid and dangerous anyway, so it'd be good they'd have less info.Stopwatch wrote: Btw, I agree with Miaka on the increased mental healthcare all the way (and in most countries improvement in that is *needed*). Taking the focus off the culprit is also good, but I think that certain people (like police and obviously courts) should still have some access to info about any factors surrounding the culprit (such as mental health issues, family situations, if there were any warning signs and so on) in order to help prevent and look out for more instances of this.
Takes Police quite a while to arrive. If the burglar is good, they can be in and out with anything of value in under 4 minutes. That reminds me, I miss the show "It Takes a Thief". I'd also say your last example is an example of Darwinism at work, and should be allowed.mangaluva wrote: It's the homeowners whose first response to a suspected burglar is to grab a gun and shoot rather than call the police, whose first response is to try to kill someone. It's the people who keep loaded guns around, have parties and have stupid ideas for party games.
As for keeping it in a safe: that kind of negates the whole "I need it to protect my home" thing. Gun doesn't do any good if it's in another room or takes forever to get to. Still shouldn't be accessable by children, though.
It was never removed. It's still illegal to own assault weapons. But like Commie said, what an actual "assault weapon" is versus what the media calls them is different.miakakiri wrote: I'm not proposing we disallow all firearms, but the assault rifle ban needs to be re-instituted.