I didn't know you'd take that seriously! :Vxpon wrote:okay. i wont leave...Mohorovicic wrote: If xpon leaves:![]()
![]()
But truthfully, I need a person that can get me lynched.

I didn't know you'd take that seriously! :Vxpon wrote:okay. i wont leave...Mohorovicic wrote: If xpon leaves:![]()
![]()
[19:40] IU IS JK ROWNLING?!?!?
[19:40] Just kidding
[19:40] IU IS JUST KIDDING ROWLING?!?!?
Conia wrote: Why am I thinking a ferret is an experiment from PT to mix the charm of dogs with the evilness of cats? :V
I want to be that role too. D:Kaito Lady wrote: And i wanna be Kaito KID!!!!![]()
![]()
Terry Pratchett wrote: The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
bash7353 wrote:I kind of always assumed that Haneda's parents might've had names.
For me and miiko we try to find solutions, so that there would be as less inactive as possible. Getting rid of inactive disrupts the balance of the game. And for passing the actions, this has been asked in rounds before and the rules are still the same, only for lover and Bfs and DBs. For the numbers of phrase me and miiko will need to discuss this and will get back to u during the post of the prep phrase change.Stopwatch wrote: A question to the GM(s): How many phases can a player be 'inactive' before you get rid of them? And does passing on the actions count as being inactive?
GreatMystery_angel801 wrote: Nomemory added
Only lovers and DBs. No BFFs (to prevent the Vermy-Sonoko situation).Mystery_angel801 wrote:For me and miiko we try to find solutions, so that there would be as less inactive as possible. Getting rid of inactive disrupts the balance of the game. And for passing the actions, this has been asked in rounds before and the rules are still the same, only for lover and Bfs and DBs. For the numbers of phrase me and miiko will need to discuss this and will get back to u during the post of the prep phrase change.Stopwatch wrote: A question to the GM(s): How many phases can a player be 'inactive' before you get rid of them? And does passing on the actions count as being inactive?
Also, me and miiko are both sending u guys ur roles. We're splitting it up, so it would be faster. And sending in actions to us both would be nice, that way we wouldn't have to ask each other for actions and it would be less confusing. And results would be out faster;)
Nomemory added
I don't know when that became a rule, but lots of people use multi-recipient PMs :Vnomemory wrote:Edit: The rules state that multi-recipient PMs aren't allowed but I suppose that is false if the recipients are Mystery and miiko since they're co-GMs?Mystery_angel801 wrote: Nomemory added
Without u i would probably be making so many mistakemiikosan wrote:Only lovers and DBs. No BFFs (to prevent the Vermy-Sonoko situation).Mystery_angel801 wrote:For me and miiko we try to find solutions, so that there would be as less inactive as possible. Getting rid of inactive disrupts the balance of the game. And for passing the actions, this has been asked in rounds before and the rules are still the same, only for lover and Bfs and DBs. For the numbers of phrase me and miiko will need to discuss this and will get back to u during the post of the prep phrase change.Stopwatch wrote: A question to the GM(s): How many phases can a player be 'inactive' before you get rid of them? And does passing on the actions count as being inactive?
Also, me and miiko are both sending u guys ur roles. We're splitting it up, so it would be faster. And sending in actions to us both would be nice, that way we wouldn't have to ask each other for actions and it would be less confusing. And results would be out faster;)
Nomemory added
I'd say 3 phases. Then they'll be arrested.
I think it means to a GM and an ally 'cause that can be used to prove them.Parkur wrote:I don't know when that became a rule, but lots of people use multi-recipient PMs :Vnomemory wrote:Edit: The rules state that multi-recipient PMs aren't allowed but I suppose that is false if the recipients are Mystery and miiko since they're co-GMs?Mystery_angel801 wrote: Nomemory added
Terry Pratchett wrote: The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
bash7353 wrote:I kind of always assumed that Haneda's parents might've had names.