Kogoro: BUT YOU ARE MOURI RAN!
...............
LOL

Lmfao..this guy obvously doesn't like comedy >.>TheBlind wrote:I agree. Part one gave me high hopes for this two part special but that was destroyed quickly with part two. The comic relief took a huge nose dive and resorted to the same formula(involving Ran & Mouri) while the episode just felt like it was going through the motions. Then there was the very unbelievable event that all three suspects where present when Oomine made his declaration at the restaurant when Part One(which used the scene at least two times) never mentioned it.Akonyl wrote: I liked most of it, even how random stuff like chucking the gun in the right place at the right time got him saved, but I was pretty annoyed by how they didn't really show the actual villain at all until the very end where they say "oh btw it's this guy lol", thought it was sort of lame.
Are you talking about the DB episode with the nice culprit who was essentially just repeating a well known crime by the book(no pun intended)???ranger wrote:Yeah I pretty much agree. I think the only decent AO I've seen so far was the one when Shinichi's parents disguise as B-org members, and the one when the Detective boys get the case right and not Conan.GinRei wrote: This was such a ridiculous and stupid case. So much stuff just happened to go right for this guy to be proven innocent. But the sad part? It's probably the best AO in at least the last 100 episodes.
That was a a horrible episode by any standards if you ask me. None of it made sense or even bothered to use any kind of logic. All the way from Haibara's cryptic one liners and her magically being present at the end(seriously, how did she even get there?) all the way to the DBs been asses because they where right(imagine if Conan was an ass to them every time he proved them wrong). I kept waiting for the part it turned out to be all a dream one of the DBs had after eating too much candy or something...
No, I obviously like comedy but I think you have mistaken "Well I found it funny and if some didn't then....THEY MUST NOT LIKE COMEDY!" with "I found it funny but I see that some people had a different opinion".KaitoKid0 wrote: Lmfao..this guy obvously doesn't like comedy >.>

Why are you taking me so seriously..damn whats wrong with y.ouTheBlind wrote:No, I obviously like comedy but I think you have mistaken "Well I found it funny and if some didn't then....THEY MUST NOT LIKE COMEDY!" with "I found it funny but I see that some people had a different opinion".KaitoKid0 wrote: Lmfao..this guy obvously doesn't like comedy >.>
......I'm not, hence my previous reply. You are one of a kindKaitoKid0 wrote:Why are you taking me so seriously..damn whats wrong with y.ouTheBlind wrote:No, I obviously like comedy but I think you have mistaken "Well I found it funny and if some didn't then....THEY MUST NOT LIKE COMEDY!" with "I found it funny but I see that some people had a different opinion".KaitoKid0 wrote: Lmfao..this guy obvously doesn't like comedy >.>


I'm sorry but haven't flamed anyone s idk what your talking about and ? wtf you think you know me? when id you get into this? why do you people always want to start something its so annoyig.kkslider5552000 wrote: KaitoKid0's"if I flame you I pretend to just be joking" gimmick has gotten boring. Besides,
Rule #1. Don't flame people unless it is blatantly obvious that you aren't being serious.
Rule #2. Smilies help
Rule #3. Spellcheck.KaitoKid0 wrote:I'm srry but havent flamed anyone s idk what your talking about and ? wtf you think you know me? when id you get into this? why do you people always want to star something its so annoyig.kkslider5552000 wrote: KaitoKid0's"if I flame you I pretend to just be joking" gimmick has gotten boring. Besides,
Rule #1. Don't flame people unless it is blatantly obvious that you aren't being serious.
Rule #2. Smilies help
