Ch. 687: Shiratori's Memories
Posted: April 8th, 2009, 2:58 am
I just finished reading the latest case file. I feel a bit sad for Shiratori, but his basis for targeting Satou is rather lame. It's still kind of cute fora memory. I'm with Haibara. How could he of been sure that the girls from his past is Satou.
I was almost with him when I heard Ayumi ask for the straw wrappers. I thought we would later find out that it would be something she learned from Satou at some point. That was before I heard what Ayumi say to that lady who appeared in this recent case.
I also had the same thought as Conan about the Gomera movies. When I saw the ticket that said, "FINAL". I was thinking that wasn't that what they said about the last Gomera movie they made in that case years ago.
Did strike me as odd that Haibara was freaked out by the guts in Gomera. Who knew she could be so cute? She used to be in an evil organization to develop a drug. I would of thought she would of dissected the mice they experimented on. It reminds me of that line Tom Hanks used in the movie A League of Their Own. "There's no crying in baseball!" To Haibara I say, "There's no getting scared in evil organizations!"
I think I will take this time to go over my case thoughts. I am right now working on VERY basic information. In the next chapter something could every well happen to put things into a different light. I'm only working with one suspect right now, with a possible stalker in the mix.
I did notice that while Agasa couldn't come and bought the tickets online. There was no gap in seating with the kids. This wouldn't too odd from most people at the movies, but judging from all the conversation, and the image of Shiratori's ticket, I'm assuming that in this theater the seating is assigned. Since there was no gap where the kids were sitting I'm guessing that Agasa bought the tickets online after he realized he wouldn't be able to go.
Here in the US I know most up scale movie theaters are using computers to calculate how many seats that are sold. This is used mainly to to the advent of online ticket purchases. It's to prevent over selling tickets for a certain showing. That is one of the reasons while I was actually a bit surprised that the ticket we saw in Shiratori's hands didn't show a time for that movie. Your average movie ticket shows the movies name, theater number, and movie time. This is actually the first time I have ever seen assigned seating for a movie. Where I am it's always been a first come, first served deal with the seating. I doubt the seating is done at random by the computer either. That would make an awkward date if you are a couple rows away from each other.
I think I'm going to talk about this murder. I don't have a name on him yet, but it's easy to tell that he was killed by a possible multiple blunt force trauma strikes to the back left side of his head. Judging from the blood he hasn't moved since he was hit on the head. Blood is subject to gravity and the directionality of the blood flow can tell you of a victim's movements. Since the blood is flowing generally downward it doesn't appear he's moved from that spot. There is also no disruption in the blood pool's flow. Not even smearing near his hand, holding the phone. Though I should point out in the last page. The first panel shows his hand in the blood pool, but in the third panel it's just outside of it.
There is some blood splatter on his brow and it seems like there is some on the back of his jacket. That's also consistent with the angle his head is currently in. As if he was glancing over his shoulder at his attacker at first.
Though I'm guessing the cause of death may be blood loss.
It seems that a 'stalker' will be the initial suspect for now. Though anyone else see a similarity in that case of this unknown stalker from the case with Eri and her Olympic medalist friend? Though that theme was also used in the case with those TV stars that involved Yoko at that throat cutting in case, but I digress.
Looking at the condition of the room. The door is locked with a bolt style lock that is only locked and unlocked from the outside with a key, or locked from the inside by hand after the door is shut. There is a mail slot, but a closed cabinet to hold the mail. The inside of the locked didn't seem to have any blood on it. That would seem to imply the door wasn't locked on the inside by the boyfriend, but we haven't seen both his hands. With any lack of a blood trail leading from the door and the body it would be very unlikely there could be a claim of a fight with an attacker and he locked the door before passing out, but like I said before. The blood on his forehead doesn't change direction. If you thought that some person was stalking your girlfriend would invite them in, let alone turn your back on them like that.
Now for right now I'm only going to say IF this lady, Kasakura Nami, is the killer of her boyfriend. I believe that call Conan noticed was a part of her alibi. She will claim that the call was from her boyfriend to give the impression that he was still alive while she was at the movies. Time of death is normally estimated between a few hours, but if the police suspect that the call was made to her during the movie they will assume the call log on the phone his time of death.
I seriously doubt it was just a coincidence that she got her seat right next to Shiratori. I noticed that she recognized the kids. If my current theory is correct I believe that she purposely left her wallet on the ticket booth. For a trick like this one to work she would need someone to come with her to be with her at the movie and serve as an alibi. I believe that she was hoping that is was going to be an adult. Surely a person who would be kind enough to return a wallet would show interest if she was being stalked. Though since it was kids she couldn't, or wouldn't use them as alibi witnesses. That could of been when she noticed them talking with Shiratori. It did strike me as odd that such a lovely woman would attend a monster movie like Gomera, unless she's some kind of fan over the year of the movies. Shiratori only bought his ticket by accident. It's also possible that she purposely bumped into him to cause his drink to spill to be a reason to strike up a conversation with and make a connection. She also most likely shows Ayumi that straw wrapper trick as a sign of thanks to the return of her wallet. I would like to see her ticket stub. To see if her ticket number was either just before or after Shiratori's. She was to his left, but that doesn't tell me the order the seats are numbered. She could be in seat F-24 or F-26.
Another thing I thought was odd about this woman was that she was still wearing that tall puffy hat during the movie. It's not like she was blocking anyone, so I guess it isn't so odd. Just felt a bit rude. Not to mention that she would leave her cell phone on. I've yet to be a movie where there isn't a reminder about turning cellphones off. If she was polite enough to make up for spilling a drink of a stranger then she most likely wouldn't leave her cellphone on.
I did notice that the flower pattern she used on the straws is a different one then the girl from Shiratori's memory. That little girl did a sakura pattern which has five petals. This woman did a flower pattern that has six petals. If anything they looked more like snowflakes then flower petals to me. I don't know much about flowers so I'm not sure what flower she was emulating.
I'll be interested to see what police detectives come to this case. Just story wise I wouldn't be surprised if it's Satou and Takagi. The flower petal straw will probably come up.
The question that needs to be asked of her. Why is it she didn't go to the movie with her boyfriend if she had been so concerned about a stalker?
I was almost with him when I heard Ayumi ask for the straw wrappers. I thought we would later find out that it would be something she learned from Satou at some point. That was before I heard what Ayumi say to that lady who appeared in this recent case.
I also had the same thought as Conan about the Gomera movies. When I saw the ticket that said, "FINAL". I was thinking that wasn't that what they said about the last Gomera movie they made in that case years ago.
Did strike me as odd that Haibara was freaked out by the guts in Gomera. Who knew she could be so cute? She used to be in an evil organization to develop a drug. I would of thought she would of dissected the mice they experimented on. It reminds me of that line Tom Hanks used in the movie A League of Their Own. "There's no crying in baseball!" To Haibara I say, "There's no getting scared in evil organizations!"
I think I will take this time to go over my case thoughts. I am right now working on VERY basic information. In the next chapter something could every well happen to put things into a different light. I'm only working with one suspect right now, with a possible stalker in the mix.
I did notice that while Agasa couldn't come and bought the tickets online. There was no gap in seating with the kids. This wouldn't too odd from most people at the movies, but judging from all the conversation, and the image of Shiratori's ticket, I'm assuming that in this theater the seating is assigned. Since there was no gap where the kids were sitting I'm guessing that Agasa bought the tickets online after he realized he wouldn't be able to go.
Here in the US I know most up scale movie theaters are using computers to calculate how many seats that are sold. This is used mainly to to the advent of online ticket purchases. It's to prevent over selling tickets for a certain showing. That is one of the reasons while I was actually a bit surprised that the ticket we saw in Shiratori's hands didn't show a time for that movie. Your average movie ticket shows the movies name, theater number, and movie time. This is actually the first time I have ever seen assigned seating for a movie. Where I am it's always been a first come, first served deal with the seating. I doubt the seating is done at random by the computer either. That would make an awkward date if you are a couple rows away from each other.
I think I'm going to talk about this murder. I don't have a name on him yet, but it's easy to tell that he was killed by a possible multiple blunt force trauma strikes to the back left side of his head. Judging from the blood he hasn't moved since he was hit on the head. Blood is subject to gravity and the directionality of the blood flow can tell you of a victim's movements. Since the blood is flowing generally downward it doesn't appear he's moved from that spot. There is also no disruption in the blood pool's flow. Not even smearing near his hand, holding the phone. Though I should point out in the last page. The first panel shows his hand in the blood pool, but in the third panel it's just outside of it.
There is some blood splatter on his brow and it seems like there is some on the back of his jacket. That's also consistent with the angle his head is currently in. As if he was glancing over his shoulder at his attacker at first.
Though I'm guessing the cause of death may be blood loss.
It seems that a 'stalker' will be the initial suspect for now. Though anyone else see a similarity in that case of this unknown stalker from the case with Eri and her Olympic medalist friend? Though that theme was also used in the case with those TV stars that involved Yoko at that throat cutting in case, but I digress.
Looking at the condition of the room. The door is locked with a bolt style lock that is only locked and unlocked from the outside with a key, or locked from the inside by hand after the door is shut. There is a mail slot, but a closed cabinet to hold the mail. The inside of the locked didn't seem to have any blood on it. That would seem to imply the door wasn't locked on the inside by the boyfriend, but we haven't seen both his hands. With any lack of a blood trail leading from the door and the body it would be very unlikely there could be a claim of a fight with an attacker and he locked the door before passing out, but like I said before. The blood on his forehead doesn't change direction. If you thought that some person was stalking your girlfriend would invite them in, let alone turn your back on them like that.
Now for right now I'm only going to say IF this lady, Kasakura Nami, is the killer of her boyfriend. I believe that call Conan noticed was a part of her alibi. She will claim that the call was from her boyfriend to give the impression that he was still alive while she was at the movies. Time of death is normally estimated between a few hours, but if the police suspect that the call was made to her during the movie they will assume the call log on the phone his time of death.
I seriously doubt it was just a coincidence that she got her seat right next to Shiratori. I noticed that she recognized the kids. If my current theory is correct I believe that she purposely left her wallet on the ticket booth. For a trick like this one to work she would need someone to come with her to be with her at the movie and serve as an alibi. I believe that she was hoping that is was going to be an adult. Surely a person who would be kind enough to return a wallet would show interest if she was being stalked. Though since it was kids she couldn't, or wouldn't use them as alibi witnesses. That could of been when she noticed them talking with Shiratori. It did strike me as odd that such a lovely woman would attend a monster movie like Gomera, unless she's some kind of fan over the year of the movies. Shiratori only bought his ticket by accident. It's also possible that she purposely bumped into him to cause his drink to spill to be a reason to strike up a conversation with and make a connection. She also most likely shows Ayumi that straw wrapper trick as a sign of thanks to the return of her wallet. I would like to see her ticket stub. To see if her ticket number was either just before or after Shiratori's. She was to his left, but that doesn't tell me the order the seats are numbered. She could be in seat F-24 or F-26.
Another thing I thought was odd about this woman was that she was still wearing that tall puffy hat during the movie. It's not like she was blocking anyone, so I guess it isn't so odd. Just felt a bit rude. Not to mention that she would leave her cell phone on. I've yet to be a movie where there isn't a reminder about turning cellphones off. If she was polite enough to make up for spilling a drink of a stranger then she most likely wouldn't leave her cellphone on.
I did notice that the flower pattern she used on the straws is a different one then the girl from Shiratori's memory. That little girl did a sakura pattern which has five petals. This woman did a flower pattern that has six petals. If anything they looked more like snowflakes then flower petals to me. I don't know much about flowers so I'm not sure what flower she was emulating.
I'll be interested to see what police detectives come to this case. Just story wise I wouldn't be surprised if it's Satou and Takagi. The flower petal straw will probably come up.
The question that needs to be asked of her. Why is it she didn't go to the movie with her boyfriend if she had been so concerned about a stalker?


