Shiho + Ran!

Abs. · Post by **Abs.** » December 3rd, 2009, 2:05 am

Originally, I wanted to write a long opening post detailing things and all academic-like, but then I figured it's more fun to do it this way:

Shiho wants RAN, not Shinichi!

Post your counterarguments here! I will defend!

Umandsf · Post by **Umandsf** » December 3rd, 2009, 3:13 am

Okay. Uh...I don't like? Seriously, I see nothing here to support this. Therefore, I shall oppose it. Besides, I never really liked same-gender 'shipping (no offense).

Abs. · Post by **Abs.** » December 3rd, 2009, 4:10 am

Dude, you were supposed to go all, "NOOOO IF ANYTHING SHIHO WANTS SHINICHI BECAUSE XYZ"

or

"NOOO THERE'S PROOF THAT SHIHO TOTALLY HATES RAN IN THE CASE OF XYZ WHERE JKL HAPPENED"

Give me something to go on here.

Umandsf · Post by **Umandsf** » December 3rd, 2009, 8:15 am

No, I don't really act that way.

baka1412 · Post by **baka1412** » December 3rd, 2009, 8:40 am

Should i cry ?

or surprised ?

or laugh ?

or angry ?

Never the less, it is a small thread from a human.. but a giant leap for DC universe..

karisama · Post by **karisama** » December 3rd, 2009, 8:44 am

Crack!pairings are yummy with crack!threads on top.

SHIHO ISN'T LESBIAN SO SHE DOESN'T WANT RAN?

Schillok · Post by **Schillok** » December 3rd, 2009, 9:26 am

Counterargument1: There are no (obvious) signs that Shiho wants either of them.

Counterargument2: Ran reminds her too much of her (dead) sister. On the other hand... would she really mind?

Counterargument3: Haibara is obviously in love with Ayumi.

kirite · Post by **kirite** » December 3rd, 2009, 10:35 am

Oh abs did I tell you I love you today? LET THE counterARGUEMENTS BEGINNNNN.

Umandsf wrote: No, I don't really act that way.

Awww...b-but why?

Schillok wrote: Counterargument3: Haibara is obviously in love with Ayumi. :P

Love triangle O-SNAP.

Xela · Post by **Xela** » December 3rd, 2009, 10:39 am

YourÂ´re doing it wrong.
There has to be something I can counter against.
Why should people bother to counter something which is obviously not true?

Umandsf · Post by **Umandsf** » December 3rd, 2009, 12:27 pm

kirite wrote:
Umandsf wrote: No, I don't really act that way.
Awww...b-but why?

Because this isn't in the category of things I get excited about. Stick around. I'm sure to burst out about something on these forums.

Abs. · Post by **Abs.** » December 3rd, 2009, 12:36 pm

karisama wrote: Crack!pairings are yummy with crack!threads on top.

SHIHO ISN'T LESBIAN SO SHE DOESN'T WANT RAN?

Alright!

1. Shiho never said she wasn't lesbian! She never said she was straight! She never says much of anything!

2. Have you seen the way she looks at Ran!! They have to keep putting Akemi in the thought bubble JUST IN CASE someone gets offended by the blatant lesbianism! ;D

Schillok wrote: Counterargument1: There are no (obvious) signs that Shiho wants either of them.

Counterargument2: Ran reminds her too much of her (dead) sister. On the other hand... would she really mind?

Counterargument3: Haibara is obviously in love with Ayumi. :P

1. Shiho reacts too strongly, for someone who is reserved, to not want Ran. How's this! Think about when she was pleading with Ran to not go back to the office (so she wouldn't get killed). She didn't do that for Kogorou.

2. They put that resemblance in there to get past the censors only! Besides, maybe she had a thing for her sister, but with Ran, it's okay! ;D

3. HAIBARA IS A LOLICON!?

Xela wrote: YourÂ´re doing it wrong.
There has to be something I can counter against.
Why should people bother to counter something which is obviously not true?

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE. Or maybe in here. IN THIS THREAD!!!

Sakina · Post by **Sakina** » December 3rd, 2009, 1:26 pm

Abs. wrote: 3. HAIBARA IS A LOLICON!?

Xela wrote: YourÂ´re doing it wrong.
There has to be something I can counter against.
Why should people bother to counter something which is obviously not true?
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE. Or maybe in here. IN THIS THREAD!!! :o

I could argue that she's not a lolicon because she's biologically only 7 but too little is known about the Apotoxin to make me even consider doing so. Just thinking about it makes my head hurt.

James Rye · Post by **James Rye** » December 3rd, 2009, 2:47 pm

Abs. wrote: Originally, I wanted to write a long opening post detailing things and all academic-like, but then I figured it's more fun to do it this way:

Shiho wants RAN, not Shinichi!

Post your counterarguments here! I will defend!

No countearguments on my part! How about some RanxShiho pics? ItÂ´s winter, iÂ´m sure no one would be offend at some hot pics. XDDD

It would be funny if Ran would ditch Shinichi cuase of SHiho.

*Ran, i...i always... i always wanted to say that i l-l-l-lo-*
*StopbabblingShinichi! I wanna make out with Shiho-chan right now,, youÂ´re a nuisiance, get it?*

XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Misztina · Post by **Misztina** » December 3rd, 2009, 2:52 pm

Umandsf wrote: I see nothing here to support this. Therefore, I shall oppose it.

Kinda scary thought. Remined immediately of: if you are not with me you are my enemy. O.O

--

About the pairing: Nah. Seriously no. >.< Why? They are too weird to thinkof as a pair. @@ I mean I can "see" RanxKazuha, even some RanxSonoko, but with Shiho it is somehow not working.

Conia · Post by **Conia** » December 3rd, 2009, 3:00 pm

James Rye wrote:
Abs. wrote:
No countearguments on my part! How about some RanxShiho pics? ItÂ´s winter, iÂ´m sure no one would be offend at some hot pics. XDDD

It would be funny if Ran would ditch Shinichi cuase of SHiho.

*Ran, i...i always... i always wanted to say that i l-l-l-lo-*
*StopbabblingShinichi! I wanna make out with Shiho-chan right now,, youÂ´re a nuisiance, get it?*

XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Actually James, it's summer here(Argentina), but I won't complain some hot pics

Shiho + Ran!

Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!

Re: Shiho + Ran!