cchanged wrote:I maintain that Gosho went overboard on this one and perhaps unintentionally undermined Ran's character (it certainly did in my view). This is not merely a question of who deserves to be saved. By pulling the curtain, Ran essentially made the life-death decision to forsake an alternate route of rescue for everyone present based solely on her blind confidence in and shared morals with Shinichi. This was selfish of her. Also, Ran could very well have been charged with obstructing a law enforcement officer. You could argue that Ran's action should only be interpreted symbolically, whatever. Though let me reiterate my view that Ran's action actually undermines Ran's selflessness, an integral part of Ran's character.
So you are of the view that what Masumi did to get the bomber in a position where he could be taken out by police snipers should not have been intervened with? That the bomber should've been shot and killed? Or do you think there was a third way?
The way the situation ultimately ended, if Ran hadn't stepped in when she did, there would've been one death instead of none. The minute Ran stepped in, everyone was saved—from an out-of-universe perspective, at least—because the only alternative to Shinichi tricking the bomber into submission, at that point, and the standoff ending that way, would be for Ran, Kogoro, Masumi, the three suspects, the bomber, and even the riot police outside the door, to die in a fiery explosion. Killing off Ran, Kogoro and Masumi? Out of the question. Also, shooting a hostage taker in the head is the last resort. Given that, at the point when Masumi tried to have the bomber sniped, Shinichi/Conan hadn't tried to trick the bomber into thinking his sister had killed herself, all the options weren't yet exhausted.
If Shinichi/Conan was there, in person, he would've taken action to stop what Masumi was doing. If Kogoro was smarter, he would've done the same. Thus, in specifically crafted scenarios where death of a single antagonistic individual is the only way to save everyone around that individual, the desire of all three of these characters to prevent violent death can become a flaw, which can be interpreted as naive, or even interpreted as putting pure ethical egoism on full display. However, this scenario (File 771–File 774/Episode 648–Episode 650) was not one of them.
cchanged wrote:You know what I think the husband needs? He needs some psychological counseling

Yeah... I apologize for not thinking of that.

And the DBs would need some, too.
“Life is infinitely stranger than anything which the mind of man could invent. We would not dare to conceive the things which are really mere commonplaces of existence. If we could fly out of that window hand in hand, hover over this great city, gently remove the roofs, and and peep in at the queer things which are going on, the strange coincidences, the plannings, the cross-purposes, the wonderful chains of events, working through generations, and leading to the most outre results, it would make all fiction with its conventionalities and foreseen conclusions most stale and unprofitable.”
“Education never ends... it is a series of lessons, with the greatest for the last.”
― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Complete Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and His Last Bow
"I have decided to stick to love... hate is too great a burden to bear."
— Martin Luther King Jr. (A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr)